Look at the language
Find stock phrases and recurring sentence openings. See what was flagged and why.
A clearer view of the patterns in your writing.
Paste a passage. Explore the signals. Make your own judgment.
50–2,500 words · English
100+ words recommended · 25,000 characters max
See recurring phrases, sentence rhythm,
and patterns worth a second look.
Style signals, not proof of AI authorship. False positives are possible.
Writing can feel formulaic without being AI-generated. Our free AI text classifier makes the patterns visible, so you can review your draft with context instead of relying on a percentage.
Find stock phrases and recurring sentence openings. See what was flagged and why.
Explore sentence rhythm and structure. A signal is a reason to review, not a verdict.
Analysis happens in your browser. No uploads, accounts or Humanizer credits needed.
What this tool does.
And what its results mean.
An AI text classifier examines writing for patterns associated with AI-generated text. CocoHumanizer’s free tool checks sentence rhythm, stock phrases, formal transitions and repeated openings. It is a transparent style review, not a trained authorship detector.
Yes. No account, subscription or credits are needed. Check up to 2,500 words and 25,000 characters at a time, as often as you like. These checks do not use your AI Humanizer word allowance.
No. Both people and AI use similar language, so style patterns cannot prove who wrote a passage. This tool does not provide an AI probability or a verified accuracy score. Do not use its results alone to make academic, employment or disciplinary decisions.
The classifier runs in your browser. It does not upload your passage for analysis or save it in an account. Closing or reloading the page clears the text. Standard site analytics, where enabled, do not receive your passage.
This version is designed for English prose. Use at least 50 words; 100 or more words and five complete sentences give a more useful review. Other languages, code, lists and very short passages can produce misleading signals.
No. Few formulaic patterns does not mean human authorship, and this result does not predict scores from Turnitin, GPTZero or other detectors. Each tool uses its own methods.
The classifier reviews writing patterns without changing your text. The AI Humanizer rewrites a draft for a more natural voice. It is a separate tool with its own Free and Pro word allowances.
Bring your words to the AI Humanizer.